By Geoffrey Sampson, Diana McCarthy
Read or Download Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline PDF
Best foreign language study & reference books
Deutsche Schwere Panzerspahwagen КНИГИ ;ВОЕННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ Издательство: Podzun-Pallas-VerlagСерия: Waffen-Arsenal 89Автор(ы): Horst ScheibertЯзык: GermanГод издания: 1984Количество страниц: 52ISBN: 3-7909-0232-2Формат: pdf (200 dpi) 2258x1598Размер: 44,4 mb RAPIDили IFOLDER eighty five
The phenomena mentioned by means of the authors variety from artificial compounding in English to contract alternations in Arabic and complementizer contract in dialects of Dutch. Their exposition combines insights from lexicalism and allotted morphology, and is expressed in phrases obtainable to students and complex scholars.
Additional resources for Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline
One major problem in the selection process was the matter of copyright permissions. Virtually all the material used except government documents is under copyright, and it was decided that permissions would be needed before the material could be used. This occasioned a large amount of correspondence, though a large majority of the authors and publishers from whom permission was requested returned our forms promptly and often with interested and even enthusiastic comments. 1 Standard corpus of present-day American English: categories sampled I.
The 'meaning' of any speech signal must consist, then, not only of the practical situation which stimulates the making of the particular speech sounds but also of the practical response which these particular speech sounds (through language) produce in another individual. One cannot predict the particular speech sounds that A will utter in any situation or whether he will utter any sounds at all, but, if language is to fulfil its function of providing the 15 CHARLES CARPENTER FRIES means of precise social co-operation, then individual A must be able to predict with considerable accuracy the practical response which particular speech sounds will elicit in individual B.
The utterance units of the second group, those that occurred after the conversation had started, I have called 'response utterance units'. Even a very superficial examination of the utterances in the two groups revealed the fact that the 'situation utterance units', those that began the conversations, showed less diversity of form than the 'response utterance units'. Typical of the 'situation utterance units' are the following: 1. I wanted to talk to you about lot number fifty (47)14 2. Mr W— asked me to ask you if you could come to a meeting in his office tomorrow at nine with Mr O— and Mr B— (145) 3.